Rapid website improvement
The fixes that close audit findings in days, not quarters
Not everything the audit finds needs a project. A meaningful share of it is a short, defined change with a check that can be re-run afterwards to prove it landed.
Verified example
One real audit-to-audit comparison
This is the only before-and-after figure signalIQ publishes, because it is the only one we have verified end to end. It is a comparison of two audit runs on no1wellness.com — not a promise about your site.
First audit
50 checks
Later audit
50 checks
| Result | First audit | Later audit | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pass | 33 | 36 | +3 |
| Warning | 4 | 3 | -1 |
| Fail | 4 | 2 | -2 |
| Unknown | 9 | 9 | no change |
How to read this honestly
This is a verified audit-to-audit comparison of one site (no1wellness.com), not a performance claim. Part of the movement between the two runs may be detector correction — the audit engine getting better at reading the site — rather than a change to the website itself. We do not claim all five points as implementation results, and signalIQ separates website improvement from detector correction when it reports to you.
Results depend on access, architecture, scope and the issues detected. No score or outcome is promised in advance.
Read these figures as text
no1wellness.com, first audit: score 87 out of 100 — 33 pass, 4 warning, 4 fail, 9 unknown. Later audit: score 92 out of 100 — 36 pass, 3 warning, 2 fail, 9 unknown. Change: pass +3, warning −1, fail −2, unknown unchanged.
What we implement
Eight defined fixes
Each one closes a named finding. Nothing here is speculative work — if the audit did not raise it, we do not bill for it.
Page performance
Image weight and format, render-blocking resources, caching headers and the largest contentful element on the pages that actually receive traffic.
Typical: Days
Metadata and titles
Unique, accurate titles and descriptions on the pages that matter, plus canonical tags where duplicates are competing with each other.
Typical: Days
Structured and machine-readable data
Markup that lets search engines and assistants read what the business is, where it is and what it sells, instead of guessing.
Typical: Days
Mobile experience
Tap targets, overflow, font sizes and the parts of the enquiry flow that only break on a phone.
Typical: Days to a week
Forms and enquiry flow
Delivery verified, validation fixed, acknowledgement added, and a durable record created rather than one email to one person.
Typical: Days
Tracking repair
Duplicate or missing tags removed and re-installed once, with each conversion event verified against a real submission.
Typical: Days to a week
Accessibility basics
Headings in order, alternative text, contrast and keyboard focus on the enquiry path — the things that block real people from converting.
Typical: Days to a week
Broken links and redirects
Dead internal links, missing redirects after a past migration, and pages that return the wrong status code.
Typical: Days
Typical durations are planning estimates, not commitments. Actual time depends on access, platform and how much of the site is affected, and is fixed in writing before the work starts.
What becomes measurable
Every fix is re-tested against the check that raised it
- The specific audit checks that changed state from fail or warning to pass, listed individually.
- Which checks remain unknown, and exactly why they could not be verified.
- Whether a change moved a check because the site improved or because a detector was corrected — reported separately, never merged.
- Re-run scores from the same audit engine, so before and after are measured the same way.
A fix is not finished because it shipped. It is finished when the check that raised it passes on a re-run.
Engagement options
How you can buy this
The same capability, offered six ways. You are not required to buy the whole thing to get any of it.
Strategy only
A prioritised remediation plan only — what to fix, in what order, and why. Rarely needed on its own here.
Audit or review only
The audit and the finding list, with no implementation. Give it to any developer you like.
Setup only
A single sprint of defined fixes, re-tested and handed back.
Implementation project
The full finding list closed as one project, with a written before-and-after comparison at the end.
Ongoing management
Scheduled re-audits and continuous remediation, so the site does not quietly decay again.
Full-service partnership
Site health is maintained as part of the wider programme alongside campaigns, content and tracking.
What this doesn't include
- A rebuild. If the platform is the problem, rapid fixes will not save it and we will say so rather than bill for patching.
- Guaranteed score movement. What can be fixed depends on access, architecture, scope and which issues actually exist.
- Content strategy or ongoing SEO. This is remediation of named findings, not a growth programme.
- Work on a site we do not have adequate access to. Without deploy access the most we can do is hand your developer a specification.
Where this connects
Quick fixes buy time; they do not replace the build
Get the finding list first
Every fix on this page starts as a named audit finding. Run the audit, see what is actually there, then decide what you want closed.